Category:F-22 Raptors

The Lockheed Martin/Boeing F-22 Raptor is a single-seat, twin-engine fifth-generation supermaneuverable fighter aircraft that uses stealth technology. It was designed primarily as an air superiority fighter, but has additional capabilities that include ground attack, electronic warfare, and signals intelligence roles.[5] Lockheed Martin Aeronautics is the prime contractor and is responsible for the majority of the airframe, weapon systems and final assembly of the F-22. Program partner Boeing Defense, Space & Security provides the wings, aft fuselage, avionics integration, and training systems.

The aircraft was variously designated F-22 and F/A-22 during the years prior to formally entering USAF service in December 2005 as the F-22A. Despite a protracted and costly development period, the United States Air Force considers the F-22 a critical component of U.S. tactical air power, and claims that the aircraft is unmatched by any known or projected fighter,[6] while Lockheed Martin claims that the Raptor's combination of stealth, speed, agility, precision and situational awareness, combined with air-to-air and air-to-ground combat capabilities, makes it the best overall fighter in the world today.[7] Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston, former Chief of the Australian Defence Force, said in 2004 that the "F-22 will be the most outstanding fighter plane ever built."[8]

The high cost of the aircraft, a lack of clear air-to-air combat missions because of delays in the Russian and Chinese fifth-generation fighter programs, a U.S. ban on Raptor exports, and the ongoing development of the planned cheaper and more versatile F-35 resulted in calls to end F-22 production.[N 1] In April 2009, the US Department of Defense proposed to cease placing new orders, subject to Congressional approval, for a final procurement tally of 187 operational aircraft.[10] The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 lacked funding for further F-22 production. The final F-22 rolled off the assembly line on 13 December 2011 during a ceremony at Dobbins Air Reserve Base.[11]

Since 2010 the F-22 has been plagued by unresolved problems with its pilot oxygen systems which contributed to one crash and death of a pilot. The fleet was grounded for four months in 2011. The Raptor fleet has resumed flight operations, although problems with the oxygen systems have continued to be reported.[12] On 24 July 2012, the United States Air Force announced that the hypoxia like symptoms were being caused by faulty valve in the pilots' pressure vest that caused it to inflate and remain inflated, triggering breathing problems. The Air Force is replacing the valve and increasing the volume of air flowing to the pilots by removing a filter that was installed to check for contaminants in the system.

Origins An F-22 during takeoff, at Elmendorf AFB, Anchorage, Alaska.In 1981 the U.S. Air Force developed a requirement for an Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) as a new air superiority fighter to replace the F-15 Eagle and F-16 Fighting Falcon. This was influenced by the emerging worldwide threats, including development and proliferation of Soviet Su-27 "Flanker"- and MiG-29 "Fulcrum"-class fighter aircraft. It would take advantage of the new technologies in fighter design on the horizon including composite materials, lightweight alloys, advanced flight-control systems, more powerful propulsion systems, and stealth technology. A request for proposals (RFP) was issued in July 1986 and two contractor teams, Lockheed/Boeing/General Dynamics and Northrop/McDonnell Douglas, were selected on 31 October 1986 to undertake a 50-month demonstration phase, culminating in the flight test of two prototypes, the YF-22 and the YF-23.[13] [14] [15]

Each design team produced two prototypes featuring one of two engine options, one featuring thrust vectoring. The Pratt & Whitney F119 turbofan with vectored thrust permits a tighter turning radius, a valuable capability in dogfights. The ATF's increasing weight and cost drove out some features during development. A dedicated infra-red search and track (IRST) system was downgraded from multi-color to single color and then deleted, the side-looking radars were deleted and the ejection seat requirement was downgraded from a fresh design to the existing McDonnell Douglas ACES II.[16]

On 23 April 1991, the YF-22 was then announced by Secretary of the Air Force Donald Rice as the winner of the ATF competition.[17] The YF-23 design was more stealthy and faster, but the YF-22 was more agile.[18] The aviation press speculated that the YF-22 was also more adaptable to the Navy's Navalized Advanced Tactical Fighter (NATF), but the U.S. Navy abandoned NATF by 1992.[19] In 1991, the air force planned to buy 650 aircraft.[20] Production and procurementThe first operational F-22 Raptor is painted at the Lockheed Martin assembly plant at Marietta, GeorgiaThe production F-22 model was unveiled on 9 April 1997 at Lockheed Georgia Co., Marietta, Georgia. It first flew on 7 September 1997. The first production F-22 was delivered to Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, on 7 January 2003.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-21">[21] In 2006 the Raptor's development team, composed of Lockheed Martin and over 1,000 other companies, plus the United States Air Force, won the Collier Trophy, American aviation's most prestigious award.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-22">[22] In 2006, the USAF sought to acquire 381 F-22s, to be divided among seven active duty combat squadrons and three integrated Air Force Reserve Command and Air National Guard squadrons.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-afpn_20060623_ad_23-0">[23]

Several design changes were made from the YF-22 for production. The swept-back angle on the wing's leading edge was decreased from 48° to 42°, while the vertical stabilizer area was decreased by 20%. To improve pilot visibility, the canopy was moved forward 7 inches (178 mm), and the engine intakes were moved rearward 14 inches (356 mm). The shape of the wing and stabilator trailing edges was refined to improve aerodynamics, strength, and stealth characteristics.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-24">[24] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-gs_yf22_diagram_25-0">[25] Also, the vertical stabilizer was shifted rearward.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-NASA_26-0">[26]

F-22 production was split up over many subcontractors across 46 states, in a strategy to increase Congressional support for the program.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-27">[27] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-28">[28] However the production split, along with the implementation of several new technologies were likely responsible for increased costs and delays.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-29">[29] Many capabilities were deferred to post-service upgrades, reducing the initial cost but increasing total project cost.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-30">[30] Each aircraft required "1,000 subcontractors and suppliers and 95,000 workers" to build.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-31">[31] The F-22 was in production for 15 years, at a rate of roughly two per month.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-32">[32] Two F-22s during flight testing, the upper one being the first EMD F-22, "Raptor 01"The United States Air Force originally planned to order 750 ATFs at a cost of $26.2 billion,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Williams_p.22_33-0">[33] with production beginning in 1994; however, the 1990 Major Aircraft Review led by Defense Secretary Dick Cheney altered the plan to 648 aircraft beginning in 1996. The goal changed again in 1994, when it became 438 aircraft entering service in 2003 or 2004, but a 1997 Department of Defense report put the purchase at 339.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Williams_p.22_33-1">[33] In 2003, the air force said that the existing congressional cost cap limited the purchase to 277. In December 2004, the Department of Defense reduced procurement funding so only 183 aircraft could be bought.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-34">[34] The Pentagon stated the reduction to 183 fighters would save $15 billion but raise the cost of each aircraft; this was implemented in the form of a multi-year procurement plan, which allowed for further orders later. The total cost of the program by 2006 was $62 billion.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-afpn_20060623_ad_23-1">[23]

In April 2006, the cost of the F-22 was assessed by the Government Accountability Office to be $361 million per aircraft. By April 2006, $28 billion had been invested in F-22 development and testing; while the Unit Procurement Cost was estimated at $177.6 million in 2006, based on a production run of 181 aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-fighter_costs_35-0">[35] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-36">[36] It was estimated by the end of production, $34 billion will have been spent on procurement, resulting in a total program cost of $62 billion, around $339 million per aircraft. The incremental cost for an additional F-22 was estimated at about $138 million.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-afpn_20060623_ad_23-2">[23] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-usaf_fy2009_budget_37-0">[37] In March 2012, the GAO increased the estimated cost to $412 million per aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-38">[38] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-39">[39] Two F-22 Raptors line up for refueling during their first official deployment, October 2005On 31 July 2007, Lockheed Martin received a multi-year contract for 60 F-22s worth a total of $7.3 billion.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-60_F-22s_40-0">[40] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-41">[41] The contract brought the number of F-22s on order to 183 and extended production through 2011.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-60_F-22s_40-1">[40] If production were restarted the cost for another 75 aircraft was estimated in 2009 to be an extra $70 million per unit.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-42">[42]

wgAfterContentAndJS.push(function {if (window.showTocToggle) { window.tocShowText = "show"; window.tocHideText = "hide"; showTocToggle; } });

Ban on exports
No opportunity for export currently exists because the export sale of the F-22 is barred by American federal law.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-43">[43] Current customers for U.S. fighters are either acquiring earlier designs such as the F-15, F-16 Fighting Falcon, and Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, or are waiting to acquire the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II (Joint Strike Fighter), which contains technology from the F-22 but is designed to be cheaper, more flexible, and available for export.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-WP_44-0">[44] The F-35 will not be as agile as the F-22 or fly as high or as fast, but its radar and avionics will be more advanced.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-45">[45] On 27 September 2006, Congress upheld the ban on foreign sales of the F-22;<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-addr_20060927_fms_46-0">[46] and confirmed this in December 2006.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-47">[47]

The Japanese government showed interest in the F-22 for its Replacement-Fighter program.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-id_20060218_48-0">[48] However, a sale would need approval from the Pentagon, State Department and Congress. It was stated that the F-22 would decrease the number of fighters needed by the Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF), reducing engineering and staffing costs. In August 2009, it was reported that the F-22 would require increases to the military budget beyond the historic 1 percent of GDP.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-49">[49] In June 2009, Japanese Defense Minister Yasukazu Hamada said Japan still sought the F-22.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-50">[50]

Some Australian politicians and defense commentators have proposed that Australia should purchase F-22s instead of the F-35.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-age_20061002_51-0">[51] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-52">[52] In 2006, the Australian Labor Party supported this proposal on the grounds that the F-22 is a proven, highly capable aircraft, while the F-35 is still under development.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-alp_20060626_53-0">[53] However, Australia's Howard government ruled out purchase of the F-22, as its release for export is unlikely, and lacks sufficient ground/maritime strike capacity.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-abc_20060627_54-0">[54] The following year, the Australian government ordered a review of plans to procure the F-35 and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, including an evaluation of the F-22's suitability. The then Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon stated: "I intend to pursue American politicians for access to the Raptor".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-55">[55] In February 2008, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he had no objection to F-22 sales to Australia.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-56">[56] However the RAAF found that the "F-22 Raptor cannot perform the strike or close air support roles planned for the JSF."<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-57">[57] "The IAF would be happy to equip itself with 24 F-22s, but the problem at this time is the U.S. refusal to sell the aircraft, and its $200 million price tag."Israeli Air Force (IAF) chief procurement officer Brigadier-General Ze'ev Snir.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-58">[58] Thomas Crimmins of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy speculated in 2009 that the F-22 could be a strong diplomatic tool for Israel, strengthening the capability to strike Iranian nuclear facilities.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-59">[59] Crimmins also stated the F-22 may be the only aircraft able to evade Russian S-300 air defense systems, which Russia may sell to Iran.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-F-22_Buy_Time_60-0">[60] However, Lockheed Martin has stated that the F-35 can handle the S-300, additionally Russia has stated they support and voted for United Nations sanctions on Iran preventing sales of the S-300.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-61">[61] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-62">[62]

The 2010 defense authorization bill included provisions that required the DoD to prepare a report on the costs and feasibility for an F-22 export variant and another report on the impact of F-22 export sales on the U.S. aerospace industry.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-63">[63] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-64">[64]

Production termination

In 2006, David M. Walker, Comptroller General of the United States at the time, found that "the DOD has not demonstrated the need or value for making further investments in the F-22A program."<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-65">[65] During the two-month grounding of nearly 700 older F-15s in 2007, some U.S. Senators demanded Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England release three government reports supporting additional F-22s beyond the planned 183 jets.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-66">[66] In December 2007, the USAF requested continued production beyond the planned 183 F-22s.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-67">[67] Two F-22A Raptors in close trail formationIn January 2008, the Pentagon announced that it would ask Congress to fund additional F-22s to replace other aircraft lost in combat, and proposed that $497 million that would have been used to shut down the F-22 line be instead used to buy four extra F-22s, leaving the production line open beyond 2011 and allowing the next administration an option to buy more F-22s.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-F-22_reprieve_68-0">[68] Funds earmarked for line shutdown were redirected to repairs upon the F-15 fleet; delaying the end of F-22 production.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-69">[69]

On 24 September 2008, Congress passed a defense spending bill funding continued production of the F-22.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-70">[70] On 12 November 2008, the Pentagon released $50 million of the $140 million approved by Congress to buy parts for an additional four aircraft, thus leaving the Raptor program in the hands of the incoming Obama Administration.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-71">[71] On 6 April 2009, Secretary of Defense Gates called for the phasing out of F-22 production in fiscal year 2011, leaving the USAF with a production run of 187 fighters, minus losses.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-cut_10-1">[10] F-35 acquisition would be accelerated.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-72">[72] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-73">[73] On 17 June 2009 the House Armed Services Committee inserted $368.8 million in the budget towards a further 12 F-22s in FY 2011.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-74">[74]

On 9 July 2009, General James Cartwright, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, explained to the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services his reasons for supporting termination of F-22 production. He stated that fifth-generation fighters need to be proliferated to all three services by shifting resources to the multirole F-35. He noted that commanders had concerns regarding electronic warfare (EW) capabilities, and that keeping the F/A-18 production line "hot" offered a fallback option to the F-35 in the EA-18G Growler.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-75">[75] "The Pentagon cannot continue with business as usual when it comes to the F-22 or any other program in excess of our needs." Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, speaking on the cancellation.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-76">[76] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-77">[77] On 21 July 2009, President Obama threatened to veto further F-22 production.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-78">[78] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-battle_79-0">[79] On 21 July 2009, the Senate voted in favor of ending F-22 production. Secretary Gates said that the decision to end production was taken in light of the F-35's capabilities.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Gates.2C_Robert._80-0">[80] On 29 July 2009, the Air National Guard's director asked for "60 to 70" F-22s for air sovereignty missions, noting that these could lack capabilities such as ground attack.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-81">[81] On 30 July 2009, the House agreed to remove funds for an additional 12 aircraft and abide by the 187 cap.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-82">[82] In mid-2010, Gates reduced the F-22 requirement from 243 to 187 aircraft, by lowering the preparations for two major regional conflicts to one.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-83">[83] President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 in October 2009, without F-22 funding.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-nytimes.com_84-0">[84] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-85">[85]

RAND estimated the cost of restarting production to build an additional 75 Raptors to be $17 billion or $227 million per aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-86">[86] However Lockheed Martin has said that restarting the production line would only cost $200 million.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-87">[87] The RAND paper was produced as part of an USAF study to determine the costs of retaining F-22 tooling for a future Service Life Extension Program (SLEP).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-88">[88] The tooling for F-22 production will be documented in illustrated electronic manuals stored at the Sierra Army Depot.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-89">[89]

Russian and Chinese fighter developments have fueled concern; General John Corley, head of Air Combat Command, wrote in a 2009 letter to a senator, "In my opinion, a fleet of 187 F-22s puts execution of our current national military strategy at high risk in the near- to mid-term". But Gates replied "Nonsense".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-90">[90] On 8 January 2011, Gates clarified that Chinese fifth-generation fighter developments had been accounted when the number of F-22s was set, and that the United States would have a considerable advantage in stealth aircraft in 2025, even with F-35 delays.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-91">[91] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-92">[92] On 11 January 2011, China's J-20 stealth aircraft made its first flight,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-93">[93] leading to speculation on the reactivation of F-22 production;<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-94">[94] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-95">[95] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-96">[96] An August 2008 RAND study concluded the F-22 would only play a minor role in a conflict with China over Taiwan as nearby bases would be rapidly shutdown by medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs); and distant bases would rely upon vulnerable aerial refueling tankers.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-97">[97] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-98">[98]

In December 2011, the 195th and final F-22 was completed (out of 8 test and 187 combat aircraft produced).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-99">[99]

Because of the limited production run, there are zero attrition reserve aircraft and extra care is given at the Hill Air Force Base F-22 maintenance center to keep the entire fleet operational. Lockheed's retained tooling will be used to produce additional parts, if needed.[100]undefinedUpgrades

Upgrades

On 5 January 2001, Raptor 4005 flew with the Block 3.0 software, which was the first combat-capable avionics version.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-101">[101] In June 2009, Increment 3.1 was tested at Edwards Air Force Base. This provided a basic ground-attack capability through Synthetic Aperture Radar mapping, Electronic attack and the GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb. The Increment 3.1 Modification Team with the 412th Test Wing received the Chief of Staff Team Excellence Award for upgrading 149 Raptors.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-102">[102] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-103">[103] The fleet upgrade should start at the end of 2011.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-104">[104] An additional $808 million will be spent in 2013 to implement the 3.1 upgrade.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-105">[105] The first upgraded aircraft were delivered in early 2012.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-106">[106] F-22 Raptor, Andrews Air Force BaseIncrement 3.2 was to add an improved SDB capability, an automatic ground collision avoidance system for low level operations (no longer planned) and enable use of the AIM-9X Sidewinder and AIM-120D AMRAAM missiles. However, a helmet mounted cueing system has been deferred by technical issues.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-107">[107] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-108">[108] Increment 3.2 was expected to be fielded in FY15,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-opencrs.com_109-0">[109] possibly including the Multifunction Advanced Data Link (MADL).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-110">[110] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-111">[111] In July 2009, the USAF announced the modification of three business jets with the interim Battlefield Airborne Communications Node (BACN) to allow communication between F-22s and other platforms until MADL is installed.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-112">[112] In March 2010, the USAF accelerated software portions of the Increment 3.2 upgrades to be completed in FY 2013, other upgrades will be completed later.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-113">[113] Upgrading the first 183 aircraft to the 3.2 upgrade is estimated to cost $8 billion.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-114">[114] In May 2009, Gen. Norton A. Schwartz and Air Force Secretary Michael B. Donley gave testimony to Congress that this would be paid for through the early retirement of legacy fighters.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Fighter_of_the_Future_115-0">[115] A total of 249 fourth-generation fighters were retired during Fiscal Year 2010.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-116">[116] On 16 September 2009, Gates said "Our commitment to this aircraft is underscored by the 6 and-a half billion dollars... to upgrade the existing F-22 fleet to be fully mission-capable."<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-117">[117]

The USAF opened the Raptor enhancement, development and integration (REDI) contract to other bidders in January 2011 with a total budget of $16 billion.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-118">[118] On 18 November 2011, the upgrade contract with Lockheed Martin was increased by $1.4 billion to a maximum value of $7.4 billion. This increment opens the way for further upgrades in 2012.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-119">[119] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-120">[120] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-121">[121] The $11.7 billion allocated for the planned upgrades to the 3.2B level (of which $5.5 billion has been spent) includes almost $2 billion for structural repairs and reliability issues, but does not include related infrastructure costs. One of the goals of the reliability costs is to raise the fleet availability rate from its current level of 55.5% to 70.6% by 2015. The 3.2C level upgrades will be bid out as a separate project.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-122">[122]

Lockheed Martin has proposed upgrades to add capabilities from the newer F-35.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-123">[123] Elements such as MADL are delayed until the F-35 program is completed to reduce risk.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-124">[124] One upgrade from the F-35 is new high-durability stealth coatings to lower maintenance.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-125">[125] The Ada software language was blamed for slow progress and increased costs on the program, leading to a reorganization in 2011.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-126">[126] Increment 3.2A in 2014 focuses on electronic warfare, communications and identification. Increment 3.2B in 2017 will support the AIM-9X and AIM-120D missiles. Increment 3.2C in 2019 may migrate some avionics to an open platform, allowing features to be added by various companies.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-127">[127] Lockheed Martin is working on upgrading the AN/AAR-56 Missile Launch Detector (MLD) to provide situational awareness and defensive Infrared Search and Track similar to the F-35's SAIRST.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-128">[128]

The current upgrade schedule is: Features not currently planned for addition or upgrades include: Because of these limitations, the Raptor will be unable to use the off-boresite and lock-on after launch features of its missiles and therefore will remain at a disadvantage in dogfights against more recent fighter designs.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-135">[135]
 * Increment 3.1 now entering service adds capabilities for SDB, SAR, and electronic attack.
 * Update 4 in 2012 will add a rudimentary capability for the AIM-120D.
 * Increment 3.2A will be fielded in 2014 with Link 16 and electronic warfare improvements.
 * Also by mid-2014 an automatic backup oxygen supply will be installed on all aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-129">[129]
 * Update 5 in 2015 will add an initial capability for the AIM-9X.
 * In 2016 the fleet will be upgraded to 36 Block 20 training aircraft and 149 Block 30/35 operational aircraft.
 * Increment 3.2B in 2018 will add full capability for the air to air missiles, and "significantly improved ground threat geolocation". This schedule has slipped seven years because of "requirements and funding instability".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-130">[130] Because of this delay the upgrade will be applied to fielded aircraft that have already consumed a significant fraction of their useful airframe lifespan.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-131">[131] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-132">[132]
 * Increment 3.2C is still being defined.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-AWST_133-0">[133]
 * The previously planned side-mounted AESA radar arrays
 * Infrared search and track (IRST)
 * Helmet-mounted sight
 * Powered air to surface missiles, the GBU-53 Small Diameter Bomb II, or other systems capable of engaging moving ground targets<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-134">[134]

The Raptor is designed with a lifespan of 30 years and 8000 flight hours, but investigations are being made for upgrades to extend this.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-136">[136] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-137">[137] The F-22 is expected to eventually be replaced by the fighter from the Next Generation Air Dominance program.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-138">[138]

While no definitive, single cause has been found for the frequent oxygen deprivation issues that have killed at least one pilot, the F-22 will be upgraded with a 10 pound backup oxygen system, software upgrades and oxygen sensors to allow the pilots to operate normally in spite of the problem.[139]

Design

Characteristics
F-22 Raptor flying with its F119-PW-100 engines on full afterburnerThe F-22 Raptor is a fifth generation fighter that is considered a fourth-generation stealth aircraft by the USAF.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-140">[140] Its dual afterburning Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100 turbofans incorporate pitch axis thrust vectoring, with a range of ±20 degrees. The maximum thrust is classified, though most sources place it at about 35,000 lbf (156 kN) per engine.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-141">[141] Maximum speed, without external weapons, is estimated to be Mach 1.82 in supercruise mode,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-AFM_142-0">[142] as demonstrated by General John P. Jumper, former U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff, when his Raptor exceeded Mach 1.7 without afterburners on 13 January 2005.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Gen_Jumper_Mach1.7_143-0">[143] With afterburners, it is "greater than Mach 2.0" (greater than 1,317 mph, 2,120 km/h). Former Lockheed chief test pilot Paul Metz stated that the Raptor has a fixed inlet, as opposed to variable intake ramps, and that the F-22 has a greater climb rate than the F-15, despite the F-15's higher thrust-to-weight ratio of 1.2:1 (the F-22 has a ratio closer to 1:1).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_tb_144-0">[144] The U.S. Air Force claims that the Raptor cannot be matched by any known or projected fighter types,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-F-22_factsheet_5-1">[6] and Lockheed Martin claims: "the F-22 is the only aircraft that blends supercruise speed, super-agility, stealth and sensor fusion into a single air dominance platform."<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-145">[145] F-22 Raptor flight demonstration videoThe ability of airframes to withstand both stress and heat is a major design factor, thus the F-22 makes use of many polymers; however, as some of the materials are a significant health risk to personnel, technicians require protective equipment such as eye protection, respirators and gloves to work on the aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-146">[146] These same materials have been suggested to be behind the "Raptor cough" and other health problems suffered by F-22 pilots and ground crews.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-147">[147]

The use of internal weapons bays allows the aircraft to maintain a comparatively higher performance while carrying a heavy payload over many other aircraft due to a lack of drag from external stores. It is one of only a few aircraft that can supercruise or sustain supersonic flight without the use of afterburners, which consume vastly more fuel. The F-22 can intercept time-critical or rapidly moving targets that a subsonic aircraft would not have the speed to follow and an afterburner-dependent aircraft would lack fuel to reach.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-148">[148]

The F-22 is highly maneuverable, at both supersonic and subsonic speeds. It is extremely departure-resistant,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-149">[149] enabling it to remain controllable at extreme pilot inputs. The Raptor's thrust vectoring nozzles allow the aircraft to turn tightly, and perform extremely high alpha (angle of attack) maneuvers such as the Herbst maneuver (or J-turn), Pugachev's Cobra,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_tb_144-1">[144] and the Kulbit.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_tb_144-2">[144] The F-22 is also capable of maintaining a constant angle of attack of over 60°, yet still having some control of roll.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_tb_144-3">[144] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-usaf_peron_aoa_150-0">[150] During June 2006 exercises in Alaska, F-22 pilots demonstrated that cruise altitude has a significant effect on combat performance, and routinely attributed their altitude advantage as a major factor in achieving an unblemished kill ratio against other U.S. fighters and 4th/4.5th generation fighters.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ul_151-0">[151]

Members of the Fighter Mafia have criticized the shortcomings of the F-22 as compared to their ideal of the F-16 in pilot visibility, available flight hours for pilot training, a focus on Beyond-visual-range missile combat that ignores air combat history, stealth that does not cover important long range search frequencies, and very limited range.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-152">[152] And during Red Flag 2012, German pilots flying Typhoons demonstrated the weaknesses of the Raptor in close in combat due to its size, weight, disadvantage in IR sensors, and lack of off-boresite weapons.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-153">[153] The Eurofighters had a maneuverability advantage because they were flying in a stripped down configuration, but the F-22's equipment is not only built in, but blended into the airframe (for stealth) and so the Raptor always carries the additional size and weight.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-154">[154]

The F-22 has a unique combination of speed, altitude, agility, sensor fusion and stealth that all work together to increase its effectiveness. Altitude plus advanced active and passive electronic warfare systems allow the F-22 to spot targets for its own weapons at considerable ranges. Altitude plus speed increases the reach of the F-22's own weapons. Altitude naturally increases the range from ground based defenses, which increases the effectiveness of stealth, and when combined with speed reduces the time defensive systems have to react to the F-22's attacks.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-155">[155] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-156">[156] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-157">[157] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-158">[158]

Avionics
The F-22's avionics include BAE Systems E&IS radar warning receiver (RWR) AN/ALR-94,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-159">[159] AN/AAR 56 Infra-Red and Ultra-Violet MAWS (Missile Approach Warning System) and the Northrop Grumman AN/APG-77 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar. The AN/ALR-94 is a passive receiver system to detect radar signals; composed of more than 30 antennas blended into the wings and fuselage that provide all around coverage. It was described by Tom Burbage, former F-22 program head at Lockheed Martin, as "the most technically complex piece of equipment on the aircraft." It has a greater range (250+ nmi) than the radar, allowing the F-22 to limit its own radar emissions to maximise stealth. As a target approaches, the receiver can cue the AN/APG-77 radar to track the target with a narrow beam, which can be as focused down to 2° by 2° in azimuth and elevation.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-fighter_EW_next_160-0">[160] The AN/APG-77 AESA radarThe AN/APG-77 radar, designed for air superiority and strike operations, features a low-observable, active-aperture, electronically-scanned array that can track multiple targets in any weather. The AN/APG-77 changes frequencies more than 1,000 times per second to lower interception probability. Additionally, radar emissions can be focused in an electronic-attack capability to overload enemy sensors.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-161">[161] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-162">[162]

The radar's information is processed by two Raytheon Common Integrated Processor (CIP)s. Each CIP can process 10.5 billion instructions per second and has 300 megabytes of memory. Information can be gathered from the radar and other onboard and offboard systems, filtered by the CIP, and offered in easy-to-digest ways on several cockpit displays, enabling the pilot to remain on top of complicated situations. The F-22s avionics software has some 1.7 million lines of code, the majority involving processing data from the radar.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-163">[163] The radar has an estimated range of 125–150 miles, though planned upgrades will allow a range of 250 miles (400 km) or more in narrow beams.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ul_151-1">[151] In 2007, tests by Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and L-3 Communications enabled the AESA system of a Raptor to act like a WiFi access point, able to transmit data at 548 megabits per second and receive at gigabit speed; this is far faster than the Link 16 system used by U.S. and allied aircraft, which transfers data at just over 1 Mbit/s.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-164">[164]

The F-22 has a threat detection and identification capability comparative with the RC-135 Rivet Joint.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ul_151-2">[151] The F-22's stealth allows it to safely operate far closer to the battlefield, compensating for the reduced capability.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ul_151-3">[151] The F-22 is capable of functioning as a "mini-AWACS", however the radar is less powerful than dedicated platforms such as the E-3 Sentry.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_tb_144-4">[144] The F-22 allows its pilot to designate targets for cooperating F-15s and F-16s, and determine whether two friendly aircraft are targeting the same aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_tb_144-5">[144] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ul_151-4">[151] This radar system can sometimes identify targets "many times quicker than the AWACS".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ul_151-5">[151] The radar is capable of high-bandwidth data transmission; conventional radio "chatter" can be reduced via these alternative means.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ul_151-6">[151] The IEEE-1394B data bus developed for the F-22 was derived from the commercial IEEE-1394 "FireWire" bus system.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070205_165-0">[165] Sensor fusion combines data from all onboard and offboard sensors into a common view to prevent the pilot from being overwhelmed.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-166">[166]

In a critical article former Navy Secretary John Lehman wrote "[a]t least [the F-22s] are safe from cyberattack. No one in China knows how to program the '83 vintage IBM software that runs them."<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-167">[167] Former Secretary of the USAF Michael Wynne blamed the use of the DoD's Ada as a reason for cost overruns and schedule slippages on many major military projects, including the F-22 Raptor.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-168">[168] The F-22 uses the INTEGRITY-178B operating system from Green Hills Software, which is also used on the F-35, several commercial airliners and the Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-169">[169]

Herbert J. Carlisle has said that the F-22 can datalink with the Tomahawk (missile).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-170">[170]

CockpitCockpit of the F-22, showing instruments and head up display.The F-22 uses a glass cockpit with no analog flight instruments.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Williams_p10_171-0">[171] A side-stick controller and two throttles are the main flight controls. The stick is force sensitive and has limited movement. The cockpit interior lighting is fully night-vision goggle compatible.<sup class="Template-Fact" style="white-space: nowrap;">[citation needed] The monochrome head-up display by GEC (which has since become BAE Systems) offers a wide field of view and serves as a primary flight instrument for the pilot; information is also displayed upon six color liquid crystal display (LCD) panels.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Williams_p10_171-1">[171]

The Raptor has radio functionality that can be used to communicate on usual airborne comm frequencies though onboard UHF and signal processing systems, but does not have a discrete, removable radio module as conventional fighters. It is analogous to an "app" of the larger hardware capabilities. <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-172">[172] This functionality is inactive during the strictest emissions control protocols (EMCON level) for stealth purposes, but can otherwise be utilized at-will by the pilot when at lower or manual EMCON levels. Media controversy concerning its inability to communicate with other aircraft appear to be related to Raptor's use of the older IFDL datalinking standard for AWACs and Global Hawk aircraft and a side-effect of Congressional funding cuts for integrating the newest U.S. Air Force datalinking standard (MADL) into the aircraft without disrupting current EMCON performance. The new standard is also necessary for future Small Diameter Bomb usage to retarget ground munitions while airborne.

The integrated control panel (ICP) is a keypad system for entering communications, navigation, and autopilot data. Two 3 × 4 in (7.6 × 10 cm) up-front displays located around the ICP are used to display integrated caution advisory/warning data, communications, navigation and identification (CNI) data<sup class="Template-Fact" style="white-space: nowrap;">[citation needed] and also serve as the stand-by flight instrumentation group and fuel quantity indicator.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Williams_p11_173-0">[173] The stand-by flight group displays an artificial horizon, for basic instrument meteorological conditions. The 8 × 8 in (20 × 20 cm) primary multi-function display is located under the ICP, and is used for navigation and situation assessment.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Williams_p11_173-1">[173] Three 6.25 × 6.25 in (15.9 × 15.9 cm) secondary multi-function displays are located around the PMFD for tactical information and stores management.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Williams_p11_173-2">[173]

The canopy is approximately 140 inches long, 45 inches wide, and 27 inches tall (355 cm x 115 cm x 69 cm); it lacks a canopy bow for improved vision. An iridium-tin oxide coating gives the canopy a gold color and reflects radar waves.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-174">[174] The ejection seat is a version of the ACES II (Advanced Concept Ejection Seat) commonly used in USAF aircraft, with a center-mounted ejection control. Improvements over the previous models include an active arm restraint system to reduce injury.<sup class="Template-Fact" style="white-space: nowrap;">[citation needed]

The life support system integrates critical components to sustain the pilot, such as the on-board oxygen generation system (OBOGS), and a breathing regulator/anti-g valve that controls flow and pressure to the mask and garments. The pilot's protective garments are designed for chemical/biological/cold-water immersion protection, to counter g-forces and high altitudes, and provide thermal relief. The helmet incorporates active noise reduction for hearing protection.<sup class="Template-Fact" style="white-space: nowrap;">[citation needed] Suspicions regarding the performance of the OBOGS and life support equipment have been raised by several crashes.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-175">[175]

Armament
An F-22 fires an AIM-120 AMRAAMThe Raptor has three internal weapons bays: a large bay on the bottom of the fuselage, and two smaller bays on the sides of the fuselage, aft of the engine intakes.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-176">[176] It can carry six compressed-carriage medium range missiles<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-177">[177] in the center bay and one short range missile in each of the two side bays. Four of the medium range missiles can be replaced with two bomb racks that can each carry one medium-size bomb or four small diameter bombs.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-178">[178] Carrying missiles and bombs internally maintains its stealth capability and maintains lower drag resulting in higher top speeds and longer combat ranges. Launching missiles requires opening the weapons bay doors for less than a second, while the missiles are pushed clear of the airframe by hydraulic arms. This reduces the Raptor's chance of detection by enemy radar systems due to launched ordnance and also allows the F-22 to launch long range missiles while maintaining supercruise.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-179">[179] The F-22 can also carry air-to-surface weapons such as bombs with Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) guidance and the Small-Diameter Bomb, but cannot self-designate for laser-guided weapons.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-180">[180] Air-to-surface ordnance is limited to 2,000 lb (compared to 17,000 lb of F/A-18).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Polmar_181-0">[181] The Raptor has an M61A2 Vulcan 20 mm cannon in the right wing root. The M61A2 carries 480 rounds; enough ammunition for approximately five seconds of sustained fire. The opening for the cannon's firing barrel is covered by a door when not in use to maximise stealth.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Miller_2005_p94_182-0">[182] The F-22 has been able to close to gun range in training dogfights while avoiding detection.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_tb_144-6">[144] The cannon fire is tracked by the aircraft's radar and displayed on the pilot's head up display.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-183">[183] For stealth, the F-22 carries weapons in internal bays. The open doors for the center bay and smaller side bays are visible here.The Raptor's very high sustained cruise speed and operational altitude add significantly to the effective range of both air-to-air and air-to-surface munitions. This gives it a 40% greater employment range for air to air missiles than the F-35.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-184">[184] The USAF plans to procure the AIM-120D AMRAAM, reported to have a 50% increase in range compared to the AIM-120C. While specific figures remain classified, it is expected that JDAMs employed by F-22s will have twice or more the effective range of munitions dropped by legacy platforms.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-afm_200605_185-0">[185] In testing, a Raptor dropped a 1,000 lb (450 kg) unpowered, free-fall JDAM from 50,000 feet (15,000 m), while cruising at Mach 1.5, striking a moving target 24 miles (39 km) away.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-upi_20061122_186-0">[186]

While the F-22 typically carries its weapons internally, the wings include four hardpoints, each rated to handle 5,000 lb (2,300 kg). Each hardpoint has a pylon that can carry a detachable 600 gallon fuel tank or a launcher holding two air-air missiles. However, the use of external stores has a detrimental effect on the F-22's stealth, maneuverability and speed. The two inner hardpoints are "plumbed" for external fuel tanks; the hardpoints can be jettisoned in flight so the fighter can maximise its stealth after exhausting external stores.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-187">[187] A stealth ordnance pod and pylon is being developed to carry additional weapons internally.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-188">[188]

Stealth
The stealth of the F-22 is due to a combination of factors, including the overall shape of the aircraft, the use of radar absorbent material (RAM), and attention to detail such as hinges and pilot helmets that could provide a radar return.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-globalsecurity_f22_stealth_189-0">[189] However, reduced radar cross section is one of five facets of presence reduction addressed in the designing of the F-22. The F-22 was designed to disguise its infrared emissions, reducing the threat of infrared homing ("heat seeking") surface-to-air or air-to-air missiles, including its flat thrust vectoring nozzles.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-190">[190] The aircraft was designed to be less visible to the naked eye; radio, heat and noise emissions are equally controlled.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-globalsecurity_f22_stealth_189-1">[189]

The F-22 apparently relies less on maintenance-intensive radar absorbent material and coatings than previous stealth designs like the F-117. These materials caused deployment problems due to their susceptibility to adverse weather conditions.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ag_191-0">[191] Unlike the B-2, which requires climate-controlled hangars, the F-22 can undergo repairs on the flight line or in a normal hangar.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ag_191-1">[191] Furthermore, the F-22 has a Signature Assessment System, which presents warning indicators when normal wear-and-tear degrades the aircraft's radar signature to the point of requiring substantial repair work.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ag_191-2">[191] The exact radar cross section (RCS) remains classified; however, in early 2009 Lockheed Martin released information on the F-22, indicating it to have a RCS (from certain angles) of −40 dBsm – the equivalent radar reflection of a "steel marble".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-F-22_Design_Shows_192-0">[192] Maintenance of the F-22's stealth features decreases the mission capable rate to approximately 62–70%.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-194">[N 2] F-22 with external pylons The effectiveness of the stealth characteristics is difficult to gauge. The RCS value is a restrictive measurement of the aircraft's frontal or side area from the perspective of a static radar. As soon as the F-22 maneuvers, it exposes a completely different set of angles and surface area, increasing visibility. Furthermore, the use of stealth contouring and radar absorbent material are chiefly effective against high-frequency radars, usually found on other aircraft. Low-frequency radars, employed by weather radars and ground warning stations, are alleged to be less affected by stealth characteristics and are more capable of detecting aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-200">[199] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-201">[200] The result of these faint and fleeting radar contacts is that while defenders could become aware of the presence of a stealth aircraft, means of interception cannot be reliably vectored in to shoot down the aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-202">[201]

The F-22 also includes measures designed to minimize its detection by infrared, including special paint and active cooling of leading edges to deal with the heat buildup encountered during supercruise flight.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-203">[202]

Designation and testing
An F-22 refuels from a KC-135 during testing; the attachment on the back top is for a spin recovery chuteThe YF-22 was originally given the unofficial name "Lightning II", after the World War II fighter P-38, by Lockheed, which persisted until the mid-1990s when the USAF officially named the aircraft "Raptor". The aircraft was also briefly dubbed "SuperStar" and "Rapier".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-204">[203] The F-35 later received the Lightning II name on 7 July 2006.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-jsf_name_announcement_205-0">[204] In September 2002, Air Force leaders changed the Raptor's designation to F/A-22. The new designation, mimicking the Navy's McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet, was intended to highlight plans for a ground-attack capability amid intense debate over the relevance of expensive air-superiority jets. The F-22 designation was reinstated on 12 December 2005, when the aircraft entered service.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-F-22_factsheet_5-2">[6] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-afp_20051205_206-0">[205]

Flight testing of the F-22 began in 1997. Raptor 4001 was retired and sent to Wright-Patterson AFB to be fired at for testing the fighter's survivability. Usable parts of 4001 would be used to make a new F-22. Another engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) F-22 was also retired and likely to be sent to be rebuilt. A testing aircraft was converted to a maintenance trainer at Tyndall AFB.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-f22team_20060429_207-0">[206]

In May 2006, a released report documented a problem with a forward titanium boom on the aircraft. The problem was caused by a manufacturing defect in the heat-treating, making the boom less ductile than specified and potentially shortening the lives of roughly the first 80 F-22s. Modifications were implemented to restore full life expectancy.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-autogenerated1_208-0">[207] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-209">[208]

Entering service
On 15 December 2005 the USAF announced that the Raptor had reached its Initial Operational Capability (IOC).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-210">[209] During Exercise Northern Edge in Alaska in June 2006, 12 F-22s of the 94th FS downed 108 adversaries with no losses in simulated combat exercises.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-afpn_20060623_ad_23-3">[23] In two weeks of exercises, the Raptor-led Blue Force amassed 241 kills against two losses in air-to-air combat; neither Blue Force loss was an F-22. Shortly after was Red Flag 07-1 in February 2007. Fourteen F-22s of the 94th FS supported Blue Force strikes and undertook close air support sorties themselves. Against superior numbers of Red Force Aggressor F-15s and F-16s, 6-8 F-22s maintained air dominance throughout. No sorties were missed because of maintenance or other failures, and only one Raptor was judged lost against the opposing force's defeat.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-211">[N 3] F-22s also provided airborne electronic surveillance.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-flag_212-0">[210] An F-22 from Elmendorf AFB, Alaska, intercepting a Russian Tupolev Tu-95 near American airspace====[edit] Deployments==== While attempting its first overseas deployment to the Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, Japan, on 11 February 2007, six F-22s flying from Hickam AFB, Hawaii experienced multiple computer failures while crossing the 180th meridian of longitude (the International Date Line). The failures included navigation and communication.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-213">[211] The fighters were able to return to Hawaii by following tanker aircraft. Within 48 hours, the error was resolved and the journey resumed.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-214">[212] 90th Fighter Squadron performed the first F-22 NORAD interception of two Russian Tu-95MS 'Bear-H' bombers over Alaska, on 22 November 2007.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-215">[213] Since then, F-22s have also escorted probing Tu-160 "Blackjack" strategic bombers.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-216">[214]

On 12 December 2007, General John D.W. Corley, USAF, Commander of Air Combat Command, officially declared the F-22s of the integrated active duty 1st Fighter Wing and Virginia Air National Guard 192d Fighter Wing fully operational, three years after the first Raptor arrived at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-217">[215] This was followed from 13 to 19 April 2008 by an Operational Readiness Inspection (ORI) of the integrated wing which rated it "excellent" in all categories, with a simulated kill-ratio of 221–0.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-218">[216] The first pair of Raptors assigned to the 49th Fighter Wing became operational at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, on 2 June 2008.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-219">[217]

In December 2007, Secretary of the Air Force Michael Wynne requested that the F-22 be deployed to the Middle East; Secretary of Defense Gates rejected this option.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-220">[218] Time suggested part of the reason for it not being used in the 2011 military intervention in Libya may have been its high unit cost.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-221">[219] An F-22 observes as an F-15 Eagle banks left. The F-22 is intended to replace the F-15C/DOn 28 August 2008, an unmodified F-22 from the 411th Flight Test Squadron performed in the first ever air-to-air refueling of an aircraft using synthetic jet fuel. The test was a part of a wider USAF effort to qualify aircraft to use the fuel, a 50/50 mix of JP-8 and a Fischer-Tropsch process-produced, natural gas-based fuel.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-222">[220] Then in 2011 a Raptor made a supersonic flght on a 50% mixture of biofuel derived from camelina.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-223">[221]

In April 2012, the U.S. military deployed several F-22s to an allied base less than 200 miles from Iran.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Iran_224-0">[222] The Iranian defense minister called the deployment of stealth fighters to the UAE a security threat.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-225">[223]

Maintenance and training
F-22 Raptor U.S. Air Force videoIn 2004 the F-22 had a mission ready rate of 62% fleet wide but this was improved to 70% in 2009, with the mission ready rate being predicted to reach 85% as the fleet reached 100,000 flight hours.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-hatch.senate.gov_226-0">[224] In the early years of its service, the F-22 required more than 30 hours of maintenance for every flight hour, with the total cost per flight hour of $44,000, however in 2008 this figure had been lowered to 18.1 hours, and 10.5 hours by 2009;<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-hatch.senate.gov_226-1">[224] this is compared to the original Pentagon requirement of 12 maintenance hours per flight hour.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-AWST_133-1">[133] At introduction the F-22 also had a Mean Time Between Maintenance (MTBM) of 1.7 hours, however in the 7 years since this has been improved to 3.2 hours, exceeding the original requirement of 3.0 hours by 2010.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-hatch.senate.gov_226-2">[224]

Each Raptor requires a month-long packaged maintenance plan (PMP) after every 300 flight hours.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-227">[225] The aircraft's stealth system, including its radar absorbing metallic skin, account for almost one third of all maintenance.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-hatch.senate.gov_226-3">[224] Another source of maintenance problems is that many components require custom hand-fitting and are not interchangeable.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-WP_44-1">[44] The canopy of the aircraft was required to have a life of 800 hours, however the original design failed to meet this, averaging at 331 hours.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-WP_44-2">[44] In response to this the canopy was redesigned, and the new canopy has met its requirements of a 800 hour life expectancy.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-hatch.senate.gov_226-4">[224]

In January 2007, it was reported that the F-22 maintained a 97% sortie rate (flying 102 out of 105 tasked sorties) while amassing a 144-to-zero kill ratio during "Northern Edge" air-to-air exercises held in Alaska, the first large-scale exercise in which the Raptor participated. Lt. Col. Wade Tolliver, the squadron commander of the 27th FS commented: "the stealth coatings are not as fragile as they were in earlier stealth aircraft. It isn't damaged by a rain storm and it can stand the wear and tear of combat without degradation."<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ag_191-3">[191] However, rain has caused "shorts and failures in sophisticated electrical components" when the Raptors were briefly posted to Guam.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-228">[226]

In its 2012 budget request the USAF cut F-22 flight training hours by one-third to reduce the operating costs of flying the aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-229">[227] The F-22 will continue in its role as an airshow demonstration aircraft and will be the only USAF solo aircraft demonstrator in 2012.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-230">[228]

Operational problems
On February 11, 2007, twelve Raptors flying from Hawaii to Japan were forced to turn back due to a software glitch in the F-22s' on-board navigational computers.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-231">[229] During 2010–2012 periodic operational hazards surfaced regarding F-22 operations. In February 2010 the entire fleet was grounded due to rusting ejection seat rods.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-232">[230] In May 2011 the entire fleet was grounded following the November 2010 crash near Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska. The F-22 had been restricted to flying below 25,000 ft while the Honeywell oxygen generating system was inspected. After five incidents of pilots suffering from hypoxia and decompression,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-233">[231] General William M. Fraser III of Air Combat Command grounded the F-22 fleet indefinitely on 3 May 2011.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-234">[232] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-235">[233] In June 2011, the investigation broadened across the life support systems,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-236">[234] and aircraft deliveries were stopped.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-237">[235] During the investigation it was found that F-22 pilots suffered from a "Raptor Cough" and other breathing problems nine times more often than the pilots of other fighters.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-238">[236] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-239">[237]

In late October 2011, Lockheed Martin was awarded a $24M contract to find the cause of the oxygen system difficulty, as well as providing other sustainment functions.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-240">[238] During the investigation various causes were investigated including poisoning by carbon monoxide from the engines while warming up the aircraft inside the hangars,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-241">[239] other chemicals have been inhaled from the on-board oxygen generating system (OBOGS), including oil fumes and propane,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-242">[240] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-243">[241] other toxins that could enter the aircraft environmental control systems such as neurotoxic diisocyanates from the polyurethane adhesive used to glue stealth materials to the aircraft,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-244">[242] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-245">[243] high concentrations of oxygen caused by high-G high altitude maneuvers that other American jet fighters can not duplicate, leading to the collapse of the pilot's pulmonary alveolus,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-246">[244] and that the breathing system on board the Raptor might not provide sufficient oxygen in some situations.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-247">[245]

In September 2011, the F-22 returned to flight with added pilot safety equipment and careful monitoring of crew and aircraft, while the investigation continued.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-248">[246] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-249">[247] On 21 October 2011, Langley's F-22s were grounded after a suspected oxygen system problem;<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-250">[248] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-251">[249] Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson grounded their aircraft as well.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-252">[250] All aircraft were cleared to fly again on 25 October.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-253">[251]

In mid-December 2011, the Air Force said that there had been 14 episodes since September, when the F-22s returned to operation, in which pilots experienced "physiological incidents" that might have been caused by a lack of oxygen.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-254">[252] Up to April 2012 seven serious accidents occurred with two pilots killed. Since the redeployment in September 2011, 11 incidents of pilots reporting hypoxia-like symptoms have been recorded.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-255">[253]

Air Force pilots have reported being pressured to continue flying the aircraft in spite of fearing for their safety because of the still-unresolved problems with the oxygen system.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-CBS_60min_12-1">[12] And half of all F-22 pilots have "lost confidence in the aircraft".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-256">[254] General Mike Hostage stated that some of the 200 Raptor pilots have asked to transfer to other areas because of the problem.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-257">[255] Hostage said that he will start flying the aircraft himself to better understand the relevant issues.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-258">[256] Hostage qualified on the Raptor in June 2012.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-259">[257]

In May 2012, it was announced that two pilots, Major Jeremy Gordon and Captain Josh Wilson, who had appeared on the CBS news program 60 Minutes, saying they didn’t feel safe in the jet, were considered whistleblowers protected by the federal whistleblower legislation.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-260">[258] Defense Secretary Leon Panetta subsequently ordered that all F-22 flights stay "within the proximity of potential landing locations" as more pilots came forward to report hypoxia-like symptoms.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-261">[259] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-262">[260]

Another cause may be the pressure-garment worn by the pilots, which may interfere with breathing; the fix may be to use the more evolved design built for the F-35.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-CBS_60min_12-2">[12] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-263">[261] In the meantime the pilots have been instructed to not wear the pressure vests during routine flights.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-264">[262] The same vests have shown an almost "unanimous failure rate in testing".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-265">[263]

The two most recent breathing incidents were determined to be the results of mechanical problems unrelated to the general problem.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-266">[264]

In July 2012 the Pentagon concluded that a pressure valve on vests worn during high-altitude flights and a harmless & precautionary carbon filter recently installed to ensure air quality were likely the sources of at least some of the hypoxia-like symptoms and that long distance flights can resume, but without the vests and therefore at lower altitudes than normal. The precautionary carbon filters were also changed to a different model to reduce shedding of inert, but understandably alarming, black dust into pilot's lungs. <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-267">[265] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-268">[266] The first overseas flight under the new rules was a routine rotation through Kadena Air Base in Okinawa.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-269">[267]

On August 1, 2012 it was announced that the connector hoses and valves of the "Combat Edge" upper pressure garment were at fault in many recent hypoxia-like instances, specifically the breathing regulator/anti-G (BRAG) valve that is used to inflate the vest.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-270">[268]

Variants

 * YF-22A – pre-production version used for ATF testing and evaluation. Two were built.
 * F-22A – single-seat production version. Was designated "F/A-22A" in early 2000s.
 * F-22B – planned two-seat variant, but was dropped in 1996 to save development costs.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Pace_p28_271-0">[269]
 * Naval F-22 variant – a carrier-borne variant of the F-22 with swing-wings for the U.S. Navy's Navy Advanced Tactical Fighter (NATF) program to replace the F-14 Tomcat. Program was canceled in 1993.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Pace_p28_271-1">[269]

Derivatives
The FB-22 was a proposed medium-range bomber for the USAF.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Long_arm_272-0">[270] The FB-22 was projected to carry up to 30 Small Diameter Bombs to about twice the range of the F-22A, while maintaining the F-22's stealth and supersonic speed.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-273">[271] However, the FB-22 in its planned form appears to have been canceled with the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review and subsequent developments, in lieu of a larger subsonic bomber with a much greater range.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-274">[272] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-275">[273]

The X-44 MANTA, or multi-axis, no-tail aircraft, was a planned experimental aircraft based on the F-22 with enhanced thrust vectoring controls and no aerodynamic surface backup.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-nasa_monogr_276-0">[274] The aircraft was to be solely controlled by thrust vectoring, without featuring any rudders, ailerons, or elevators. Funding for this program was halted in 2000.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-nasa1_277-0">[275]

Operators
F-22A Raptor from Tyndall AFB, Florida cruising over the Florida PanhandleAn F-22 landing at Holloman AFB, New MexicoAn F-22, based at Elmendorf AFB, Alaska, over mountain terrainThe United States Air Force is the only operator of the F-22. It has ordered 187 aircraft with the last to be received by early Q2 2012.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-reuters.com_278-0">[276] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-279">[277] It is operated by the following commands:
 * Air Education and Training Command
 * 325th Fighter Wing, Tyndall AFB, Florida
 * 43d Fighter Squadron – The first squadron to operate the F-22 and continues to serve as the Formal Training Unit.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-280">[278] Known as the "Hornets", the 43d was re-activated at Tyndall in 2002.
 * Air Combat Command
 * 1st Fighter Wing, Langley AFB, Virginia
 * 27th Fighter Squadron – The first combat F-22 squadron. Began conversion in December 2005 after and flew the first operational mission (January 2006 in support of Operation Noble Eagle).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Langley_281-0">[279]
 * 94th Fighter Squadron
 * 49th Fighter Wing, Holloman AFB, New Mexico<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-282">[280]


 * 7th Fighter Squadron
 * 8th Fighter Squadron
 * 53d Wing, Eglin AFB, Florida
 * 422nd Test and Evaluation Squadron – The "Green Bats" are responsible for operational testing, tactics development and evaluation for the F-22 at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Tyndall_2_283-0">[281]
 * 57th Wing, Nellis AFB, Nevada
 * 433d Weapons Squadron<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-284">[282]
 * Air Force Materiel Command
 * 412th Test Wing, Edwards AFB, California
 * 411th Flight Test Squadron – Conducted competition between YF-22 and YF-23 from 1989–1991. Continues to conduct flight test on F-22 armaments and upgrades.
 * Pacific Air Forces
 * 3d Wing, Elmendorf AFB, Alaska
 * 90th Fighter Squadron – Converted from F-15Es; first F-22A arrived 8 August 2007.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-285">[283] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-286">[284]
 * 525th Fighter Squadron
 * 15th Wing, Hickam AFB, Hawaii
 * 19th Fighter Squadron - Associate PACAF squadron to the 199th Fighter Squadron (Air National Guard). <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-288">[N 4]
 * Air National Guard
 * 192d Fighter Wing, Langley AFB, Virginia.
 * 149th Fighter Squadron, Virginia Air National Guard – Associate ANG squadron to the 1st Fighter Wing (Air Combat Command).
 * 154th Wing, Hickam AFB, Hawaii<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-289">[286]


 * 199th Fighter Squadron, Hawaii Air National Guard
 * Air Force Reserve Command
 * 44th Fighter Group, Holloman AFB, New Mexico <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-290">[287]


 * 301st Fighter Squadron - Associate AFRC squadron to the 49th Fighter Wing (Air Combat Command).
 * 477th Fighter Group, Elmendorf AFB, Alaska.
 * 302d Fighter Squadron - Associate AFRC squadron to the 3rd Wing (Pacific Air Forces).

Accidents
The F-22 has the highest accident rate of any USAF fighter aircraft in service. This rate is expected to go down as the Air Force gains more experience in operating the aircraft. This may be because of the platform's relative immaturity due to its early operational status and low number of flight hours.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-291">[288]

In April 1992, the first YF-22 crashed while landing at Edwards Air Force Base, California. The test pilot, Tom Morgenfeld, escaped without injury. The cause of the crash was found to be a flight control software error that failed to prevent a pilot-induced oscillation.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-292">[289]

The first crash of a production F-22 occurred during takeoff at Nellis Air Force Base on 20 December 2004, in which the pilot ejected safely before impact.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-293">[290] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-294">[291] The crash investigation revealed that a brief interruption in power during an engine shutdown prior to flight caused a malfunction in the flight-control system;<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-gs_f22_flight_tests_295-0">[292] consequently the aircraft design was corrected to avoid the problem. All F-22s were grounded after the crash; operations resumed following a review.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-296">[293]

On 25 March 2009, an F-22 crashed 35 miles (56 km) northeast of Edwards Air Force Base during a test flight,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-297">[294] resulting in the death of Lockheed test pilot David P. Cooley.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-WP_44-3">[44] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-298">[295] An Air Force Materiel Command investigation found that Cooley momentarily lost consciousness during a high-G maneuver, then ejected when he found himself too low to recover. Cooley was killed during ejection by blunt-force trauma from the aircraft's speed and the windblast. The investigation found no issues with the F-22's design.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-299">[296]

On 16 November 2010, an F-22, based at Elmendorf, Alaska, lost contact with Air Traffic Control.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-300">[297] The aircraft was discovered to have crashed; the pilot, Captain Jeffrey Haney, was killed.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-301">[298] The F-22 fleet was restricted to flying below 25,000 feet, before being grounded completely, while the accident was investigated.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-302">[299] During the summer of 2011, more wreckage from the crash site was recovered; the accident has been attributed to a malfunction in the bleed air system that shut down the aircraft's Environmental Control System (ECS) and On-Board Oxygen Generating System (OBOGS).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-303">[300] The OBOGS, which is fed by engine bleed air, was apparently shut down automatically in response to an engine overheat condition detected by the main computer.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-304">[301] The accident review board, however, ruled the pilot (wearing bulky cold-weather gear and nightvision goggles) was to blame for the accident, as he did not react properly and did not engage the emergency oxygen system.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-305">[302] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Fatal_problems_plague_306-0">[303] Schwartz has called the Pentagon Office of the Inspector General investigation of the report "routine",<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-307">[304] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-308">[305] but did not assign blame to the pilot.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-309">[306] The pilot's widow sued, claiming the aircraft has defective equipment.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-310">[307] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-311">[308] In response to the accident investigation results, the engagement handle for the emergency oxygen system was redesigned to improve location and grasping, and the emergency oxygen system should engage automatically when OBOGS is shut down due to an engine failure.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-312">[309] The aircraft's manufacturers reached a settlement with the pilot's family.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-313">[310]

Aircraft on display
In April 2007 The National Museum of the United States Air Force announced it had added EMD F-22A 91-4003 to its collection. It would later be put on display<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-314">[311] in the space being occupied by a Lockheed YF-22. The Museum publicly unveiled its F-22 display on 18 January 2008.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-315">[312]

Specifications
F-22 with drop tanks in transit to Kadena Air Base, Japan from Langley Air Force Base, Virginia

<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0.2em; font-size: 90%;">Data from USAF,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-F-22_factsheet_5-3">[6] F-22 Raptor Team web site,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-flt_test_316-0">[313] Manufacturers' data,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-lm_specs_317-0">[314] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-318">[315] Aviation Week,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ul_151-7">[151] and Journal of Electronic Defense,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-fighter_EW_next_160-1">[160]

General characteristics Performance USAF poster overview of key features and armamentArmament Avionics
 * Crew: 1
 * Length: 62 ft 1 in (18.90 m)
 * Wingspan: 44 ft 6 in (13.56 m)
 * Height: 16 ft 8 in (5.08 m)
 * Wing area: 840 ft² (78.04 m²)
 * Airfoil: NACA 64A?05.92 root, NACA 64A?04.29 tip
 * Empty weight: 43,430 lb (19,700 kg<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-F-22_factsheet_5-4">[6] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-lm_specs_317-1">[314] )
 * Loaded weight: 64,460 lb (29,300 kg<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-320">[N 5] )
 * Max. takeoff weight: 83,500 lb (38,000 kg)
 * Powerplant: 2 × Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100 Pitch Thrust vectoring turbofans
 * Dry thrust: 23,500 lb<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Miller_p108_321-0">[317] (104 kN) each
 * Thrust with afterburner: 35,000+ lb<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-F-22_factsheet_5-5">[6] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Miller_p108_321-1">[317] (156+ kN) each
 * Fuel capacity: 18,000 lb (8,200 kg) internally,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-F-22_factsheet_5-6">[6] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-lm_specs_317-2">[314] or 26,000 lb (11,900 kg) with two external fuel tanks<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-F-22_factsheet_5-7">[6] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-lm_specs_317-3">[314]
 * Maximum speed:
 * At altitude: Mach 2.25 (1,500 mph, 2,410 km/h) [estimated]<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-AFM_142-1">[142]
 * Supercruise: Mach 1.82 (1,220 mph, 1,963 km/h)<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-AFM_142-2">[142]
 * Range: >1,600 nmi (1,840 mi, 2,960 km) with 2 external fuel tanks
 * Combat radius: 410 nmi (with 100 nmi in supercruise) <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-flt_test_316-1">[313] (471 mi, 759 km)
 * Ferry range: 2,000 mi (1,738 nmi, 3,219 km)
 * Service ceiling: 65,000 ft (Currently restricted to 44,000 ft, sans vests)<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-322">[318] (19,812 m)
 * Wing loading: 77 lb/ft² (375 kg/m²)
 * Thrust/weight: 1.09 (1.26 with loaded weight & 50% fuel)
 * Maximum design g-load: -3.0/+9.0 g<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-AFM_142-3">[142]
 * Guns: 1× 20 mm (0.787 in) M61A2 Vulcan 6-barreled gatling cannon in starboard wing root, 480 rounds
 * Air to air loadout:
 * 6× AIM-120 AMRAAM
 * 2× AIM-9 Sidewinder
 * Air to ground loadout:
 * 2× AIM-120 AMRAAM and
 * 2× AIM-9 Sidewinder for self-protection, and one of the following:
 * 2× 1,000 lb (450 kg) JDAM or
 * 8× 250 lb (110 kg) GBU-39 Small Diameter Bombs
 * Hardpoints: 4× under-wing pylon stations can be fitted to carry 600 U.S. gallon drop tanks or weapons, each with a capacity of 5,000 lb (2,268 kg).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Miller_2005_p94-100_323-0">[319]
 * RWR (Radar warning receiver): 250 nmi (463 km) or more<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-fighter_EW_next_160-2">[160]
 * Radar: 125–150 miles (200–240 km) against 1 m2 (11 sq ft) targets (estimated range)<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-avweek_20070107_ul_151-8">[151]
 * Chemring MJU-39/40 flares for protection against IR missiles.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-324">[320]